Job news & views

Search

Post your resume

Back

Print

GUEST COMMENT: How to handle compromise agreements

25 January 2008

Philip Landau , Partner , Landau Zeffert Weir

If you lose your job in an investment bank, one of the first things you’re likely to come across is a compromise agreement. For those who are unfamiliar with the term, a compromise agreement is recognised by statute and is the only way employers can ensure you validly ‘contract out’ of bringing any future claim against them – ie, once you’ve signed one, forget any claims of discrimination or unfair dismissal.

A compromise agreement is usually signed following the termination of your employment, or as part of the process that brings it to an end. It usually provides for a severance payment, in return for which you agree not to pursue any claims in an employment tribunal. For it to be valid, you must take independent advice from a lawyer.

No comeback

So far, so good, except banks are now increasingly using compromise agreements as a mechanism for preventing possible future complaints to a tribunal. Even where a bank is confident that it has followed a fair process, it will prefer the employee to sign a compromise agreement to ensure there is no comeback afterwards. This can apply even when you are only receiving a redundancy payment in line with the bank’s own policy. In cases where there is a background of dispute or a breakdown in the relationship with an employee, a bank is likely to insist an agreement is entered into, subject of course to the terms of departure having been first agreed.

Simple, standard terms

So, should you be worried about signing away your rights in this way? Whilst it is the case that compromise agreements can be written in very legalistic language and can refer to sections of Acts and Regulations which you may never have heard of, most are fairly standard and in simple terms mean you cannot claim under any statute. As long as the severance pay you are receiving is properly reflected in the agreement, and there are no unusual onerous terms, you should not be too worried.

In fact, being presented with a compromise agreement can be a good thing. Not only is there certainty of payment within an agreed timescale (usually 14 days from the date of termination or the return of the signed agreement), but the agreement will confirm the first £30k if a redundancy/severance payment is tax free. It is useful to have this recorded in a legal document for Revenue purposes. You also get the chance to have a reference attached to the agreement – which binds the bank when references are requested from future employers. This is very useful where an employee may have left under a cloud and is in danger of receiving a negative reference after leaving the bank.

Enhanced payment?

Most significantly, however, a compromise agreement will give a good employment laywer an opportunity to challenge the amount being offered under the agreement and negotiate an increase. Although banks do not operate an 'open cheque policy', they can be receptive to a request for an enhanced payment if there is a reasoned argument properly put.

The incentive for banks, of course, is that they will know there is no 'coming back for more' by the employee after the agreement is signed. But watch out. There may be some sneaky clauses in there – such as the introduction of post termination restrictions that did not form part of your original contract of employment. This could take you out of the market for many months after you have left. That is why you need to chose your legal adviser carefully!

Philip Landau is a partner at London law firm Landau Zeffert Weir. Feel free to contact him on pl@lzwlaw.co.uk or 020 7357 9494 for a free consultation on this or any other employment law issue.

Comments (14)

Even if you have the best case many banks hope you will walk away quietly and not seek damages and will fight to the bitter end. You need nerves of steel to fight a bank, but sometimes it comes down to more than just the money!

View all comments

Bookmark

  • Digg.com
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumbleupon.com
  • Reddit.com
  • Yahoo.com

Comments (14)

  • my lawyer was useless.  he didn;t even confirm whether my payout was good or bad in the current climate.  i had to do all the chasing!  be careful when choosing your lawyer as he might not be bothered to do any extra leg work for you other than simply signing the agreement for a presumably hefty fee

    daddy 25 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • This lawyer is just trying to drum up business. ALL Lawyers are snakes. If you're in this business you should have enough brain cells to negotiate-out something reasonable. What these bastards wont tell you is that the minute you hire a lawyer "publicly" - your marketability to other firms becomes compromised. Meanwhile you're paying outrageous fees to a snake in a suit for getting his starbucks drinking secretary to search and replace names on a WORD boilerplate document. In the end-maybe a year later- you've lost opportunities and probably developed some blood pressure issues and that once friendly lawyer has you by the short and curlies. And what do you really have to show for it. Ain't life grand?

    Axl Rose 26 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Take care when choosing a lawyer. Unless you are willing to pay their hourly rate - usually £250hr - they won't be particularly motivated to negotiate a good settlement figure. So accept any fixed fee arrangements with caution. Also be aware that the protection you get under compromises is not very strong. Employers often start spreading rumours about you to get back at you, despite the confidentiality, non derogation and reference clauses which are meant to bind them under these agreements

    Anon 26 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • How is the rule at New York ?  Any good lawyer would charge based on the pecentage of the payout ?

    Tom 30 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • In London, you can choose your fee arrangement. Hourly, no win no fee with about 30% of the settlement going to the lawyer or a fixed fee which means the lawyer is only motivated to spend a fixed number of hours on your case and probably won't negotiate the best figure. Most lawyers offer a free initial consultation, so it is best to talk to a few different solicitors. London lawyers will be much more expensive than regional ones, but they are more likely to have experience negotiating with City banks which helps. Even if you have the best case many banks hope you will walk away quietly and not seek damages and will fight to the bitter end. You need nerves of steel to fight a bank, but sometimes it comes down to more than just the money!

    Anon 31 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Rubbish! If an old employer does try to blackball you after they sign a compromise agreement, it is a specific breach of contract and you have the option to sue them for damages resulting from the breach or accept the breach of contract. If the breach is fundamental the contract is at an end, leaving you free to discuss the concerns you had about the company which they tried to pay you off to keep quiet about! Only bad employers would go against a legal agreement and they deserve to be exposed so other employees are not also bullied!

    Undisclosed 09 Feb 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • What about when you sign a compromise agreement based on the information the bank has given you about the redundancy process, and then discover that you were picked on a whim, at random, and the data the bank claims to have used to select you was actually put together AFTER you were selected for the chop?  Doesn't that invalidate the compromise agreement utterly?  Surely a contract entered into by two parties with one party knowingly duping the other into signing on the basis of false statements, has to be null and void?

    Jane 02 Apr 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • In answer to Jane's query, you will have no rights once the compromise agreement is signed, other than enforcing the agreement itself. It is for this reason that you need to be sure of all the facts before you enter into the agreement. For example, ask to see the selection criteria/scoring PRIOR to signing on the dotted line. A good lawyer will ensure that such factors are considered before advising you to sign the agreement.

    Philip Landau (employment law solicitor) 02 Apr 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • I can accept that this would be the case if you didn't have legal representation - my point is that the bank in question falsified the information given in response to the employment lawyer's queries in order to appear compliant with Employment Law.  It was only discovered after the Compromise Agreement was signed when the HR director in charge of the cover-up catastrophically let slip the true data (accidentally sending it to a former colleague - who was then gagged from whistleblowing in yet another Compromise Agreement).  Surely this undermines the whole point and principle of Compromise Agreements?  They aren't there to cover up unlawful behaviour, surely?

    Jane 03 Apr 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • What, no employment lawyers out there reading this and gagging to comment? Compromise agreements are central to City life - and city folk need to understand what they're getting into, after all. Are CA's a licence to cheat employees by virtue of their employers paying out a derisory sum that shuts those employees up for life?  How did our law get to this parlous state? Are the current pickings so rich lawyers don't need to worry about billable hours any more?  Ah well.  At least someone's profiting from the tough terrain we're in.

    Jane 15 Apr 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

Add your comment

* Mandatory

You have 1200 characters left

Enter the code shown here or sign in / register to skip this step. (What is this?)

Post comment

Jobs

Col3
Col4
Col5
Col6
bottom

Site Information

eFinancialCareers is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company. Dice Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Ticker: DHX)