Job news & views

Search

Post your resume

Back

Print

Ratings agencies not so secure after all

10 January 2008

eFinancialCareers UK

Ratings agency types who thought they had a job for life are being made to think again.

Ratings agencies have been known to promote themselves as kindly employers less inclined than investment banks to take an axe to the workforce when things go wrong. That cuddly image has just died a horrible death.

Moody’s is reportedly slashing 275 jobs globally, Toronto-based rater DBRS is said to have cut three European offices and 43 European jobs, and McGraw Hill Companies, the parent company of Standard & Poors, says it’s cutting 172 jobs in its financial services unit, which includes S&P.

What’s a redundant rater to do? Recruiters say the outlook isn’t great. “Dependent upon their function across synthetic or cash, the easiest avenue is to go into an investment bank as an analyst or structurer,” says Russell Clarke at search firm Mantis Partners. “But the problem is that historically the rating process is reactive and very streamlined compared to the counterpart roles in investment banks.”

The head of structured credit research at one US bank says he hasn’t seen any ratings agency CVs yet, “but this might be because I’ve been very clear with everyone that I’m in no position to hire.”

Why?

Ratings agencies' woes stem, unsurprisingly, from the credit crisis, which has seen their predictions about the robustness of structured products proven very wrong.

Meanwhile, reduced issuance of structured products means ratings agencies have substantially less to work to do. And with most agencies having rapidly expanded their structured product groups in the past few years, further cuts can't be rued out.

“We’re expecting US and European leveraged loan CLO issuance to be down 50-55% relative to 2007 issuance, while SME CLOs are likely to hold on slightly better,” says Domenico Picone, head of structured credit research at Dresdner Kleinwort, who also predicts that the remainder of the CDO market will fare even worse.

What next?

With neither banks nor ratings agencies chasing structured credit ratings talent, there are a few alternatives left on the table, providing those let go are willing to shift their emphasis.

The head of structured credit ratings at one agency says they’re busy trying to shift staff into other areas, such as sovereign debt and the financial institutions business – “There’s going to be a renewed focus on banks’ own credit ratings and we need to ensure we have strong analysts in these positions.”

Comments (6)

if you can't hack it in investment banking, you go a coomercial bank. if you can't hack it in commercial banking, you go at one of the rating agencies. if you can't hack it at a rating agency, you go and work in a recruitment consultancy.

View all comments

Bookmark

  • Digg.com
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumbleupon.com
  • Reddit.com
  • Yahoo.com

Comments (6)

  • "The head of structured credit research at one US bank says he hasn’t seen any ratings agency CVs yet, “but this might be because I’ve been very clear with everyone that I’m in no position to hire.”"

    PMSL!

    AJS 10 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Of course no CVs have gone out, quite simply there is nowhere to go!

    CDO Boy 11 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • if you can't hack it in investment banking, you go a coomercial bank. if you can't hack it in commercial banking, you go at one of the rating agencies. if you can't hack it at a rating agency, you go and work in a recruitment consultancy.

    des 11 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • There are always jobs for the talented analysts, no matter where they've been working.

    Fi 11 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Thanks "des, Debt / Fixed Income", I'll fwd you my CV now...btw, which recruitment consultancy are you with? :-)

    Sad 11 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • I can only agree with the previous comments. Agencies are generally the worst employers in Fi.Services. Staff turnover in the worst agencies such as Fitch is usually 40-50% p.a., pay, benefits and bonus potential are the worst in the market and their hiring strategy is "anticyclical" - hire in  difficult times  because this is the only opportunity to attract talent as no talented analyst would remotely consider to work there - also because there are very limited career progression opportunities. And again management is usually incompetent, lazy, grey and boring.

    007 14 Jan 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

Add your comment

* Mandatory

You have 1200 characters left

Enter the code shown here or sign in / register to skip this step. (What is this?)

Post comment

Jobs

Col3
Col4
Col5
Col6
bottom

Site Information

eFinancialCareers is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company. Dice Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Ticker: DHX)