Bank jobs, finance jobs, recruitment in the financial markets, accounting and investment banking. Find jobs, post resumes and browse job market news

Job news & views

Search

Post your resume

 

Print

The terrible truth about the coming redundancies

4 November 2008

Sarah Butcher

It’s becoming harder to find a bank that hasn’t already laid off at least 10% of its staff. But with revenues still catastrophically low, headcount reductions to date could prove a pinprick compared to what’s coming next. Based on average pay per head for the year so far, we’ve calculated how many more people each bank would need to cut in order to maintain its compensation ratio (compensation costs as a percentage of revenues) in line with 2007. The results range from the farcical (Merrill Lynch) to the disturbing (Credit Suisse), and the reassuring (Goldman and Morgan Stanley).

Merrill Lynch

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $834m; 2007 – $19,442m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $11,170m; 2007 – $11,564m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 1,339%; 2007 – 59%

Headcount Q3: 2008 – 60,900; 2007 – 64,200

Average comp per head: 2008 – $183k

Layoffs over the past year: 3,300

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 58,195

Credit Suisse (investment bank only)

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF2,736m; 2007 – CHF16,217m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF5,682m; 2007 – CHF8,111m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 207%; 2007 – 50%

Headcount Q3: 2008 – 21,300; 2007 – 20,399

Average comp per head: CHF266k (US$228k)

Layoffs over the past year: None; 1,000 staff added*

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 16,161

Deutsche Bank

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – €6,102m; 2007 – €14,620m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – €3,250m; 2007 – €5,217m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 53%, 2007 – 36%

Headcount Q3: 2008 – 15,574; 2007 – 17,215

Average comp per head: 2008 – €209k

Layoffs over the past year: 1,668

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 5,130

UBS

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – minus CHF21,418m; 2007 – CHF11,065m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – CHF4,589m; 2007 – CHF8,326m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – unquantifiable; 2007 – 75.2%

Headcount Q3: 2008 – 18,901; 2007 – 22,666

Average comp per head: 2008 – CHF243k (US$208k)

Layoffs over the past year: 3,765**

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: Everyone

JPMorgan (investment bank only)

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $12,516m; 2007 – $14,998m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $6,535m; 2007 – $6,404m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 52%; 2007 – 43%

Headcount Q3: 2008 – 30,989; 2007 – 25,961

Average comp per head: 2008 – $211k

Layoffs over the past year: None; 5,298 staff added

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: 5,647

Morgan Stanley

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $22,881m; 2007 – $28,476m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $10,726m; 2007 – $13,365m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 46.9%; 2007 – 46.9%

Headcount Q3: 2008 – 46,383; 2007 – 47,713

Average comp per head: $231k

Layoffs over the past year: 1,330

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: No additional layoffs required

Goldman Sachs

Revenues Q1-Q3: 2008 – $23,800m; 2007 – $35,246m

Compensation costs Q1-Q3: 2008 – $11,424m; 2007 – $16,918m

Compensation ratio Q1-Q3: 2008 – 48%; 2007 – 48%

Headcount Q3: 2008 – 32,569; 2007 – 29,905

Average comp per head: 2008 – $351k

Layoffs over the past year: None; 2,664 staff added***

Layoffs required to maintain compensation ratio: No additional layoffs required

• *Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307, excluding 500 layoffs announced in October

• ** Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307; excluding 1,901 layoffs announced in October

• ***Between Q1 and Q308 vs. Q1 and Q307, excluding 3,200 layoffs announced in October

Comments (18)

Surely it's easier to just cut pay? Most of it's paid in bonus anyway, and those people getting donuts this year will help reduce the comp/revenue ratio.

View all comments

Bookmark

  • Digg.com
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumbleupon.com
  • Reddit.com
  • Yahoo.com

Comments (18)

  • Credit Suisse and UBS have never made a penny outside Switzerland. hard to believe but true.

    All the IB units in london and NY do, is justify executive compensation.

    however, ubs makes USD 8bn. with out doing anything. just from their wealth management platform. that is actuaklly the big plus and shows where they should focus. let go what has not even worked in best times..

    still around 05 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • also, according to these calc surely you need to base staff cuts coming on Q1-Q3 2009 revenues , so shouldn't you be giving us implied or expected 09 revenues? And what are these based on? Are we assuming they will be flat on 08. Or are we just talking about Q4 08? This all seems to elementary.

    Robster 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Loved the conclusion on UBS.  I dun understand these guys that keep rubbishing the articles and yet kept coming back to read and comment each time a new one is posted.  Obviously the measure was not meant to be conclusive or published in an academic journal.

    killua 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Citigroup aren't included simply because they don't break out headcount or compensation for their investment bank.

    Sarah, Editor, eFinancialCareers 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • How can you not include 'Citigroup'?
    They are the frontrunners in making people lose their jobs after Lehman Brothers.
    They are also going to write off another USD 500 Billion of assets in next two years which will make their total assets to USD 1.7 trillion from USD 2.2 trillion.

    Dhruv 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • What about BarCap?

    Robster 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Hi Bear,

    The figures for potential redundancies are based on maintaining compensation as a constant percentage of revenues, rather than on maintaining absolute comp at 2007 levels. Most US banks try and keep compensation costs at around 50% of revenues in good times and bad times, with salaries boosted by bonuses when revenues rise.

    This being the case, 2007 compensation ratios should be roughly representative of the cycle. 2008 figures look set to be an anomaly. The question is how long banks/shareholders will be willing to tolerate this.

    Sarah, Editor, eFinancialCareers 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Puzzled - the figures are for Credit Suisse's investment bank only. In the first nine months of the year it made a loss of CHF6,404m.

    Sarah, Editor, eFinancialCareers 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • According your numbers credit suisse is running at a major loss for this year. Even If the compensations costs are deferred bonuses, this does not bode well for the bank.

    Puzzled 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Hi Sarah,

    This is an interesting study, but instead of taking peak market earnings/compensation, I would have taken "normal" (average over a cycle) numbers.. maybe 2007 was way too high?

    Bear 04 Nov 2008

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

Add your comment

* Mandatory

You have 1200 characters left

Enter the code shown here or sign in / register to skip this step. (What is this?)

Post comment

Col3
Col4
Col5
Col6
bottom

Site Information

eFinancialCareers is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company. Dice Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Ticker: DHX)