Bank jobs, finance jobs, recruitment in the financial markets, accounting and investment banking. Find jobs, post resumes and browse job market news

Job news & views

Search

Post your resume

 

Print

What JP Morgan’s results say about where you should and shouldn’t be working

14 October 2009

Sarah Butcher

At first sight, JP Morgan’s results scream one thing: this is a very good year to be a banker.

Not only are third quarter profits across the bank six times higher than last year, but investment banking profits for the first nine months have quadrupled. OK, investment banking headcount is down 6k year on year (mainly due to the elimination of surplus Bear staff) and 935 quarter on quarter, but pay is up.

On closer examination, however, the great times are not universal.

Where not to work

If you’re working at JP Morgan in the current circumstances, you may not be infused with pleasure if you’re in:

M&A advisory

If there’s been a recovery in M&A, no one told JP Morgan. Despite the much trumpeted upsurge in dealmaking, advisory fees fell 33% in the third quarter compared to the same period of 2008. Admittedly, this was in line with the market (global M&A activity was down 41% over the same period), but it still doesn’t look great.

“There’s no advisory business at all. Advisory activity is beautifully correlated with rising GDP, and there aren’t a lot of places where GDP’s rising right now,” says Brad Hintz at Sanford Bernstein.

Leveraged finance

JP Morgan actually booked a $400m gain on ‘legacy leveraged lending’ in the last quarter. However, the balance sheet for its investment bank includes $4.89bn of ‘non-performing loans retained’ (up from $404m in 3Q08). These are good times to be in the business of restructuring non-performing loans. They are not good times if you’re a leveraged financier waiting for a return to the good old days.

Where to work

By comparison, happier JP Morgan bankers are to be found working in:

Prime broking

Having acquired Bear’s prime broking business, JP Morgan has been one of the big beneficiaries of the rush to diversify across prime brokers. The bank reshuffled management earlier this year in anticipation of growth and cited prime services as one of the big drivers of equities revenues in the past quarter.

Equity capital markets

M&A may be in the doldrums, but ECM isn’t. Third quarter revenues were up 31%.

Flow sales and trading

JP Morgan sealed its reputation as a ‘flow monster’ in the past quarter. Fixed income revenues held up quarter on quarter and increased $4.2bn year on year, suggesting tightening spreads haven’t put a stop to the flow party just yet. Revenue increases were achieved in both fixed income and equities sales and trading, without a corresponding increase in VaR (Goldman Sachs, take note).

Comments (4)

What tires me even more is how the populist newspapers conveniently forget the other side of the equation...where did most of the credit provided by us greedy bankers go? Oh, that's right, it went to providing real estate and mortgage finance so greedy Joe Public could buy a house he knew he couldn't afford...

View all comments

Bookmark

  • Digg.com
  • Del.icio.us
  • Stumbleupon.com
  • Reddit.com
  • Yahoo.com

Comments (4)

  • Some one tell this to the journalists at the Daily scum..sorry Daily Mail and other "news"papers targeted at evoking populist resentment towards anyone remotely associated with finance... you read their articles and it seems like all financial services staff are rolling in it- and of course all of them percipitated the financial crisis- and the poor common man is the victim.

    Disillusioned MBA 15 Oct 2009

    RECOMMEND Recommended 1 time | Alert Moderator

  • Strongly agree with Disillusioned, Jo Public has no absolutely no clue about the inner-workings of IB etc so we all get labelled as mega-rich, greedy so & so's who collectively caused the crunch. I find it dispicable that many Ops staff have lost their livelihood's thru no fault of their own & before anyone from FO posts any nasty comments here in response (as seems to be the nor on eFC, I'm FO so no sour grapes, just calling it as it is people, tell me if I'm wrong..

    emilio13 15 Oct 2009

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • Come on, of course we bankers have part of the blame. If you were anywhere near a fixed income desk that had anything to do with credit (lev fin, credit trading or sales, cdo structuring etc. etc.) between 2005 and 2007 and could not see that this was a bubble and that credit risk was fundamentally underpriced, all I can say is keep doing sales but dont ever invest your own money :-). But what tires me even more is how the populist newspapers conveniently forget the other side of the equation...where did most of the credit provided by us greedy bankers go? Oh, that's right, it went to providing real estate and mortgage finance so greedy Joe Public could buy a house he knew he couldn't afford...and that second speculative buy-to-let property that he thought he would make a killing on because house prices only ever goes up. Joe Public completely ignored the risks, driven by greed. All fine, very human, but at least take your stupid mistakes like a man, stop whining, admit you were as greedy as any banker and stop blaming the bankers. Yeah, sure, you never bragged at a single dinner party how much money you made on your house/ flat...

    Ari Gold 15 Oct 2009

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

  • all you guys are right...but remember everyone always needs someone to blame when things go wrong...and Joe Public can't know everything so has to rely on the tabloids to fill them in with wrong biased info blaming the bankers as the sole contributers to the credit crunch...so I blame the press!!

    J 15 Oct 2009

    RECOMMEND Recommended 0 times | Alert Moderator

Add your comment

* Mandatory

You have 1200 characters left

Enter the code shown here or sign in / register to skip this step. (What is this?)

Post comment

Jobs

Col3
Col4
Col5
Col6
bottom

Site Information

eFinancialCareers is a Dice Holdings, Inc. company. Dice Holdings, Inc. is a publicly traded company listed on the New York Stock Exchange (Ticker: DHX)